Screening Alerts Configurations
Last updated: June 23, 2025
1. Overview: Enterprise-Grade Configurability
Greenlite's Alerts AI product is designed to be highly configurable to match the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and standards of any compliance organization. Our system adapts to your specific requirements rather than forcing you to change your processes.
Proven Track Record
Successfully deployed at OCC-regulated banks
Trusted by large FinCEN-regulated fintechs
Auditor-tested and approved across multiple examinations
Configured to meet diverse regulatory requirements
Greenlite works by replicating the decision-making flow your analysts already follow, using a sophisticated tagging system that can be customized to match your organization's exact compliance requirements and risk appetite.
2. Default Match Tag/Mismatch Tag Logic
Greenlite's default logic evaluates the following types of factors:
Match Tags (Qualifying Factors):
Name matching (with handling for variations, nicknames, transliterations)
Date of birth matching (full and partial)
Geographic matching (full address, country, region, city)
Employment matching
Mismatch Tags (Disqualifying Factors):
Name mismatch
Date of birth mismatch
Geographic mismatches (country, region, city)
Employment mismatch
Entity type mismatch
All tag weights are fully configurable to meet each organization's specific requirements and risk appetite. The scoring starts with a base score of 5 and calculates a final True Positive likelihood on a 0-10 scale.
3. Custom Match Tag/Mismatch Logic
Screening Alert Type Logic
Configure handling based on alert type:
PEP-Specific: Example: PEP Out of Scope - mark specific types of PEPs as false positives or low risk
Adverse Media: Custom handling for negative news alerts
Sanctions: Specialized rules for sanctions list matches
Source-Based Logic
Perform false positive whitelisting for highly noisy sources
Example: Automatically mark alerts from the Chinese Credit Bureau as false positives
Entity Type Based Logic
Different handling for Company vs Person alerts
Separate scoring and thresholds by entity type
4. Evaluation Summary Configuration
Greenlite allows teams to configure the evaluation summary output of alert cases.
Example Summary:
Customer John Doe (DOB: 05/15/1985) flagged as a possible match against
John Doe - PEP List (YOB: 1985). The investigation resulted in a determination of Name Match, DOB Match, and Country Mismatch.
The investigation resulted in a False Positive disposition.Customization Options
Regulatory formatting: Match specific regulatory report requirements
Language customization: Adjust terminology to match your SOPs
Dynamic content: Include/exclude sections based on match type
5. Analyst Workflow Customization
Greenlite adapts to your existing analyst workflows:
Closure Options
Auto-Closure: Greenlite closes false positives directly in your case management tool/screening alerts provider
Hybrid: Greenlite closes specific alerts that are considered lower risk (e.g., just PEPs)
Manual Review: Human closes out all the hits individually
Batch Closure: Human closes out all the hits for a specific case at once
Integration Flexibility
API-based closure: Direct integration with your screening system
Escalation paths: Define review hierarchies
6. Research Relevancy Thresholds
Configure how external research is incorporated into investigations:
OSINT Relevance Scoring
A prompt evaluates the relevancy of OSINT information on a scale from 1 to 5:
1. Irrelevant or Misleading: Incorrect, outdated, or unrelated information. These are filtered out by default.
2. Low Relevance: Adds little value, only confirming well-established facts.
3. Moderately Relevant: Contains useful information supporting known facts or introducing tangentially related information.
4. Highly Relevant: Provides significant, directly applicable information to the investigation.
5. Critical Source: Contains crucial information that could significantly impact or redirect the investigation.
Threshold Configuration
Global threshold: Set minimum relevancy for all research findings
Default Threshold of >= 4 for all customers
AI Findings
Source: www.lawfact.co.kr
Relevance: 4/5 (Highly Relevant)
- Served in Constitutional Court as legislative researcher in 2017
- Ministry of Government Legislation positions since 1991Implementation Note
Available configurations depend on your screening system's capabilities and API functionality. Not all screening systems support all configuration options.
To customize your Greenlite implementation:
Review this documentation with your compliance team
Identify desired configurations matching your SOPs
Discuss technical feasibility with your deployment strategist
Contact your Greenlite deployment strategist to begin the configuration process tailored to your organization's specific needs.